Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
Evergreen wrote:Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
hm, I didn't notice that.Krock wrote:Evergreen wrote:Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
Krock wrote:http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
OpenGL / D3D need to be good enough - although I'm sure it's caused by D3D and not OGL.AspireMint wrote:Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
because [2^X px] is too mainstream /jk
i like 3px and 5px tp :)Krock wrote:http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Thats why this tp is also called "Drunk texture pack"
For me it works:
http://i.imgur.com/BCql0WI.png
Return to Minetest Texture Packs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests