blert2112 wrote:Is there any interest here for a "bleeding edge" Minetest build? If there is no interest I won't bother.
blert2112 wrote:70+ views and no feedback? Anybody trying this out?
MineYoshi wrote:Nice build, if i say so...
This one has very good performance!
Great work!
blert2112 wrote:MineYoshi wrote:Nice build, if i say so...
This one has very good performance!
Great work!
Thanks! I really appreciate it.
I also think it has quite good performance. Not sure if it is placebo effect, wishful thinking, or real as I have not run any comparisons. It does "feel" much better than my old personal builds that used old dll versions. That said, all credit has to go to the devs of the supporting libraries (and the Minetest devs), all I did was tell 'cmake' where everything lived. Well, maybe there was more to it than that, it took a lot of research and time to get things set up and built nicely. Seriously, the libraries in the default builds really need to be updated. Some of the commits are fairly serious.
Dopium wrote:Nice build runs well, just a suggestion can you add a changes log spoiler with each build. That way we know what changes have been made from build to build.
blert2112 wrote:Well, I could, but to be honest I'm lazy.
git log --pretty=format:%s HEAD~40..HEAD
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest