nomohakon wrote:Water and lava is not cpu-greedy
nomohakon wrote:light and shadow is based on location of player (in cave, under tree...) instead of where player is looking
nomohakon wrote:when player dig's block then the block stay digged
Calinou wrote:...nomohakon wrote:when player dig's block then the block stay digged
Anti-cheat issue, temporary solution is to disable anticheat (for servers) with "disable_anticheat = true" in minetest.conf. The cheat prevention about digging too fast is a bit too strict.
nomohakon wrote: [...] when player dig's block then the block stay digged.
Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:Water and lava is not cpu-greedy
How do you know?
Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:light and shadow is based on location of player (in cave, under tree...) instead of where player is looking
It's more a bad thing than a good thing. Fog being darker when being under a tree looks... weird?
Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:when player dig's block then the block stay digged
Anti-cheat issue, temporary solution is to disable anticheat (for servers) with "disable_anticheat = true" in minetest.conf. The cheat prevention about digging too fast is a bit too strict.
nomohakon wrote:Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:Water and lava is not cpu-greedy
How do you know?
Going far away from mobs and stuff, turning around (fast response), pouring water on ground, water goes down-hill, looking around (still fast response). Not like in minetest...Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:light and shadow is based on location of player (in cave, under tree...) instead of where player is looking
It's more a bad thing than a good thing. Fog being darker when being under a tree looks... weird?
Right... You are in cave and there is light in distance when you know the cave is dark except one torch you placed...Calinou wrote:nomohakon wrote:when player dig's block then the block stay digged
Anti-cheat issue, temporary solution is to disable anticheat (for servers) with "disable_anticheat = true" in minetest.conf. The cheat prevention about digging too fast is a bit too strict.
Anticheat? Where can i learn about this more? Is it in basic game (no aditional mods, local game)?
p.s. Note that my pc is slow piece of Sith...
Calinou wrote:Water flowing is currently slow-ish in Minetest because the water position isn't updated often. It should be tweaked, yes.
nomohakon wrote:Calinou wrote:Water flowing is currently slow-ish in Minetest because the water position isn't updated often. It should be tweaked, yes.
That is not what i mean. When i put water on hill the game go nuts and laggy. Every flowing liquid does that.
Water isnt slow, but makes game crawl (on my pc).
kaeza wrote:Open Source Software is a hobby for many of us here. We are not being paid to implement things. If you think you could contribute a little code instead of complaining, that would be very much appreciated.
kaeza wrote:Open Source Software is a hobby for many of us here. We are not being paid to implement things. If you think you could contribute a little code instead of complaining, that would be very much appreciated.
nomohakon wrote:Hi, i recently played fresh minecraft, and noticed some things. Water and lava is not cpu-greedy
nomohakon wrote:Dont take this personally. But isnt minetest aiming (going, trying) to be better than minecraft?
minetest is aiming to become a great game not a "better minecraft"MEGASPARK wrote:nomohakon wrote:Dont take this personally. But isnt minetest aiming (going, trying) to be better than minecraft?
Not sure, but i think nomohakon is slightly correct
Traxie21 wrote:If there is ONE THING Minetest does better than MC, It is the modding API and the ability of the client to download mods from the server.
jojoa1997 wrote:minetest is aiming to become a great game not a "better minecraft"MEGASPARK wrote:nomohakon wrote:Dont take this personally. But isnt minetest aiming (going, trying) to be better than minecraft?
Not sure, but i think nomohakon is slightly correct
the only thing i have to say to theat is that instead of post topics like this mybe post in the ideas topic having a running mod like minecrafts where you can run by default but it deplenishes and you have to regenerate it. Kaeza thanks it took me a while to figure that out. i used to think that this was a minecraft for slower computers but know i know that it is way more because i have gotten deeper into it.kaeza wrote:Traxie21 wrote:If there is ONE THING Minetest does better than MC, It is the modding API and the ability of the client to download mods from the server.
Wrong. Minetest does not download any mods; only the media files and a few tidbits to know what to do.jojoa1997 wrote:minetest is aiming to become a great game not a "better minecraft"MEGASPARK wrote:Not sure, but i think nomohakon is slightly correct
That's an excellent description. +1 to you.
I know that what I'll say is prolly going to start a flame war, but to those who say "Why doesn't Minetest do this thing that the foobar voxel game does?" or "This does blahblahblah", if you don't like this game, go play your favorite foobar voxel game, and stop posting these kinds of discussions. As Jordach said, this topic has been discussed to death and we're bored of it.
TL;DR: Go b*tch elsewhere.
nomohakon wrote:I said better THAN minecraft! And about water: seem you all play on expensive computers, otherwise you would notice this sooner. Also, i made some "stuff" for personal use, but i'm not proud of it, so i wont release it (spaceship engines with cooling system).
kaeza wrote:[...] but to those who say "Why doesn't Minetest do this thing that the foobar voxel game does?" or "This does blahblahblah", if you don't like this game, go play your favorite foobar voxel game, and stop posting these kinds of discussions.
kaeza wrote:Traxie21 wrote:If there is ONE THING Minetest does better than MC, It is the modding API and the ability of the client to download mods from the server.
Wrong. Minetest does not download any mods; only the media files and a few tidbits to know what to do.jojoa1997 wrote:minetest is aiming to become a great game not a "better minecraft"MEGASPARK wrote:Not sure, but i think nomohakon is slightly correct
That's an excellent description. +1 to you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests